Technical Writer, AI Evaluator & Context Curator
I make complex things make sense.
I'm a technical writer and AI evaluator with a background in content design, UX, digital project management, and QA. I work across words, context, and systems — creating and evaluating AI training data, making technical information easier to understand, and helping teams turn complicated ideas into digital experiences that work.
Area of Expertise
AI Training & Evaluation
I help train and evaluate AI systems by creating realistic scenarios, curating the context around them, and reviewing how models reason, retrieve information, use tools, and arrive at their answers. A big part of the work is asking questions like: Did the model actually understand what the user meant? Did it have the right information? Did it use the right tool? And when something went wrong, where exactly did it break? It's detailed work, and I like that.
Technical Writing
I turn complicated information into something another person can actually understand and use. That can mean documentation, instructions, guidelines, workflows, technical content, or simply taking something that exists mostly in someone's head and giving it structure.
Content & UX
Words were my first language professionally, and they're still a huge part of how I think. I write and design content for digital experiences with a focus on clarity, usefulness, structure, and the tiny decisions that make an experience feel intuitive instead of frustrating.
Digital Project Management
I've managed website projects across content, development, QA, client review, launch, and everything messy in between. I'm often the person connecting the dots: understanding what the client is asking for, figuring out what the team needs to do, noticing what's missing, and keeping the work moving.
QA & Evaluation
I have a hard time not noticing when something doesn't make sense. Whether I'm testing a website or reviewing an AI workflow, I naturally look for broken journeys, inconsistencies, edge cases, missing context, unclear language, and assumptions that don't quite hold up. It turns out that's a useful problem to have.
A Little About Me
Words have always been my thing. I just work with them differently now. I started out writing content and telling stories. That grew into UX and content design, then project management and QA, and eventually into technical writing and AI training and evaluation.
The roles have changed, but the thing I'm good at hasn't: understanding what someone is trying to do, finding what is getting in the way, and making it clearer.
I ask a lot of questions. I care about the details, but I also want to understand why we're doing something in the first place. I like clear systems, good documentation, useful feedback, and teams where people can say, “This doesn't make sense yet,” and work their way toward something better. And while I take the work seriously, I don't believe everything needs to sound serious to be good. Clarity can have personality. Technical can still feel human.
My Belief
Clarity is a form of kindness.
Good questions are often more useful than quick answers.
Details matter. Context matters more.
Technology should still feel human.
Simple doesn’t mean easy.
Stories are how we make sense of things.
There should always be room to change your mind.
And yes, seven is still my lucky number.
Awards & Recognition
Awwwards
Site of the Day, Honourable Mention (x2)
Design Rush
Best Website Designs (x2)
Communication Arts
The Gaeten Pauler Blog
Fun fact
When I'm not thinking about words, websites, or why an AI did something strange, I'm probably watching a K-drama, listening to BTS, falling down a reaction-video rabbit hole on YouTube, or finding another story to obsess over.
Because apparently even after spending my workday surrounded by information, my idea of relaxing is consuming significantly more information.